|
Post by DA on Jun 8, 2009 9:13:22 GMT -5
Discuss ![>:(](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/help.gif) Upping the out of conference limit from 3 to 5?
|
|
|
Post by liltee8869 on Jun 8, 2009 9:50:02 GMT -5
I don't like that. Yes, there are good players out there but that is why 3 is nice. It makes you think harder to get a top lineup in there with 3. If we had 5 that is more than half our lineup.
|
|
|
Post by Rybcon on Jun 8, 2009 10:06:58 GMT -5
Why was the rule restricting it to 3 put in there originally? Why have any restriction?
|
|
|
Post by eric42 on Jun 8, 2009 11:39:08 GMT -5
I am starting to think that no restriction might make the league less complicated.
Pros (to limiting non-BCS teams): - adds an element of strategy - adds more players of NFL-caliber - adds more players that will be on TV
Cons (to limiting non-BCS teams) - we have to police it - adds an ?unnecessary? element of strategy - leaves out some quality players
Originally we did it because we thought that the league would be run amuck with guys from small schools. But non-BCS schools are more competitive lately. And there are not that many of them (roughly 65 BCS and 50 non-BCS).
I believe if we didn't limit non-BCS teams, each team would have around 4-6 players from non-BCS. So, I am with Ryb... since this would not hurt the league's integrity as first feared, why not eliminate them completely?
|
|
|
Post by mcm on Jun 8, 2009 12:23:12 GMT -5
I'm in favor of no restrictions. But if it's between 3-5, then my vote is for 5.
I think originally the restriction was set in place because we were all so new to this and we thought that it was gonna be hard enough keeping track of big school players let along non-bcs players. But now that we have a few years into this league I think we are all comfortable knowing where to find non-bcs players just as easily as big school players. So like I said, I vote for no restrictions, but if we have to pick between 3-5 then I choose 5.
|
|
|
Post by Rybcon on Jun 8, 2009 12:28:34 GMT -5
I agree with MCM. If there will continue to be a restriction then I vote for 5.
|
|
|
Post by DA on Jun 8, 2009 12:33:44 GMT -5
When people start college FFLs there are two ways to go. BCS only leagues Div 1 leagues When Eric started this league I think he proposed BCS only with one non BCS player to keep things simple. Like MCM stated now that we are all college league vets getting rid of the restrictions is the best way to make this league more competitive. And like Eric mentioned the roster management will be much easier.
|
|
|
Post by mcm on Jun 8, 2009 12:36:51 GMT -5
DA, just make sure if the change is made that it's only FBS schools. Even though we are vets, adding division 2 or 3 schools WOULD be too much IMO.
For sure.
|
|
|
Post by eric42 on Jun 8, 2009 12:40:00 GMT -5
Right, Div 1A football teams only. No UC Davis, or the ever popular Appalachian State. ![:-*](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/shit.gif)
|
|
|
Post by mcm on Jun 8, 2009 12:41:11 GMT -5
Right, Div 1A football teams only. No UC Davis, or the ever popular Appalachian State. ![:-*](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/shit.gif) Now why ya gotta go and bring up App St? That's just mean eric! ![:-[](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/beer1hc6.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Rybcon on Jun 8, 2009 12:51:36 GMT -5
If you eliminate App State then how can Michigan still be in? ![:)](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/hail.gif)
|
|
|
Post by mcm on Jun 8, 2009 12:58:48 GMT -5
If you eliminate App State then how can Michigan still be in? hey now........you fickle fans can't say nothing.....MR I don't know if I'm gonna root for USC, Northwestern or Illinois. ![8-)](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/rollinglaughws8.gif) ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Rybcon on Jun 8, 2009 13:01:00 GMT -5
If you eliminate App State then how can Michigan still be in? hey now........you fickle fans can't say nothing.....MR I don't know if I'm gonna root for USC, Northwestern or Illinois. ![8-)](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/rollinglaughws8.gif) ;D ;D And what does that have to do with a team name? ![:(](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/bitchslapcd3.gif)
|
|
|
Post by ddd on Jun 8, 2009 15:04:58 GMT -5
no limits will make this very, very interesting. ![:'(](http://dynastyrogues.com/forum/images/smiles/teufel017gr9.gif)
|
|
|
Post by bobsacamano on Jun 8, 2009 15:53:43 GMT -5
Will be a bit tougher with no limits, but i think we're ready for that
|
|